Does Anyone Know the Answer to that Question? Individual Differences in Judging Answerability
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Does Anyone Know the Answer to that Question? Individual Differences in Judging Answerability
Occasionally people may attempt to judge whether a question can be answered today, or if not, if it can be answered in the future. For example, a person may consider whether enough is known about the dangers of living close to a nuclear plant, or to a major electricity cable, for them to be willing to do so, and state-authorities may consider whether questions about the dangers of new technolog...
متن کاملFaculty burnout: Does anyone think of that?
Background: Job burnout is one of the factors that decrease the productivity of university faculty members. This is important for teachers who are a critical element of the educational system. Failure to pay attention to environmental and organizational factors as well as psychological and personality traits in professors will lead to adverse effects on their mental health, inc...
متن کاملTB, or not TB: that is the question -- does TLR signaling hold the answer?
Innate immunity critically depends on signaling by Toll-like receptors (TLRs) that rely heavily on an intracellular adapter protein called myeloid differentiation factor 88 (MyD88). Adaptive immune defenses are generally thought to be orchestrated by innate immune responses and so should require intact TLR-MyD88 signaling pathways. But a surprising new study in MyD88-null mice infected with Myc...
متن کاملDoes Schrödinger’s Cat Know Something That Schrödinger Does Not Know?
Macroscopic objects appear to have definite positions. In a manyworlds interpretation of quantum theory, this appearance is an illusion; the correct view is the “view from outside” in which even macroscopic objects are in general in a superposition of different positions. In the Bohm model, objects really are in definite positions. This additional aspect of reality is accessible only from the “...
متن کاملIndividual differences in judging deception: accuracy and bias.
The authors report a meta-analysis of individual differences in detecting deception, confining attention to occasions when people judge strangers' veracity in real-time with no special aids. The authors have developed a statistical technique to correct nominal individual differences for differences introduced by random measurement error. Although researchers have suggested that people differ in...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Frontiers in Psychology
سال: 2016
ISSN: 1664-1078
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.02060